Elephant Delta day 1 – Dr R Nazim Khan from The University of Western Australia on Assessments: An Open and Closed Case
Blogging from The Tenth Southern Hemisphere Conference on the Teaching and Learning of Undergraduate Mathematics and Statistics
R Nazim Khan – UWA (photo taken from http://www.uwa.edu.au/people/nazim.khan)
See paper: Assessments: an open and closed case.
Looking at the difference between open book exams and closed book exams.
Closed book exams: How much can a student hold in their head. Only demonstrates what students can do with what they’ve memorised.
Open books exams are more like real life.
These ideas don’t have any data in them. There is research about which is ‘better’. Bailie and Toohey: Not clear that open book is really any better.
First year stats level: Can we investigate whether open or closed book leads to different understanding. Observational study:
Univariate statistical methods and some probability with an open book assessment.
Not possible to compare open book assessment with previous years due to other variations.
Because it was open book:
Students had copied down solutions from old tests: Not a good sign.…